What if the worlde were mayde of thicke starres?

Hello and welcome to my online journal. I've been sent here by a daimon to write what thoughts I might be having at any particular moment of the day, though I evade the task when I can.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Berkeley, California, United States

A 22-year old girl full of fancy, admiring people and things with a passion hidden behind glass.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

In the Publick Library

Two African cripples study Freud together in the public library;
I did not know they were cripples until I saw them stand up to leave.

Thoughts for the Day

A) The smallest gift from a cherished friend, even the simple act of giving their hand to you fondly or embracing you warmly, matters infinitely more than the worthiest treasures from an unknown or despised person/place.

B) All politics are ephemeral.

C) We don't need to get clear about semantics like the analytic philosophers worry about doing - we just need to attend to what words say in their etymology (and create new words if necessary).

D) I do philosophy not because I am strong of mind, but because I am weak of body.

Monday, October 6, 2008

The Conditions for Liberation (Homework assignment)

Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Self-Reliance is a call to look inward for the genius that inhabits the breast of every man capable of thought. Margaret Fuller’s essay, “Woman in the Nineteenth Century” is an analogous call to women to search inward for sources of strength and inspiration. Both authors speak on the tendency of people to rely on others as a ground for their sense of self. Emerson specifically contends that the opinion of the majority as it expresses itself in society should not in any way impinge itself upon the calm stability of the individual soul: “Few and mean as my gifts may be, I actually am, and do not need for my own assurance or the assurance of my fellows any secondary testimony. What I must do, is all that concerns me, not what the people think. This rule, equally arduous in actual and intellectual life, may serve for the whole distinction between greatness and meanness.”

Yet the privilege to be independent and self-determined is overlooked by Emerson as precisely that – a privilege of men. Fuller understands that this deeply rooted double standard has had immense consequences for woman and the very possibility of feminine self-reliance. If women are not allowed to think of themselves as anything but creatures “made for man”, they will not be capable, either socially or psychologically, of embracing the same independence that Emerson advocates to his readers. Fuller believes that both women and men have the innate capacity to flourish into self-creative beings, but she knows that the structural conditions of society itself must be equalized before this natural equality can be displayed in its fruition: “We would have a path laid open to Woman as freely as to Man. Were this done and a slight temporary fermentation allowed to subside, we should see crystallizations more pure and of more various beauty. We believe the divine energy would pervade nature to a degree unknown in the history of former ages, and that no discordant collision, but a ravishing harmony of the spheres would ensue. Yet, then and only then, will mankind be ripe for this, when inward and outward freedom for Woman as much as for Man shall be acknowledged as a right, not yielded as a concession.”

While fuller and Emerson fundamentally share the same thesis, Fuller acknowledges a historical/sociological dimension in this issue of liberation that must pragmatically be dealt with before the call of the Transcendentalist ideal can be successfully heard and heeded.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Thoughts on Liberation (Part I)

People have a tendency to build defenses against plurality. Rather than invest themselves in a variety of things or get involved in new experiences, they defer life for their personal status quo. Just watch a busy street that has someone trying to get people to sign a political petition or donate to an environmental cause. People have a strong impulse simply not to care, and they don't have a second thought about whether that position of apathy is justified or not. The most reasoning you will get from a contemporary American is: "Sorry, don't have enough time". Not enough time, really? What is time that it can be saved up in such a way? What better thing were you planning to do with those extra few minutes? Drink a coffee and text message your friends? What they should say is that they don't have the emotional stamina to do anything that requires them to move out of their comfort zone.

It seems as though we have been infiltrated by capitalism's ideal of specialization in the division of labour, so we invest ourselves and all our activities towards developing one skill or one facet of our lives. This certainly worked for Henry Ford in making car production more efficient - one man moulds the drive shaft, the other drills in the axles, etc. etc. They each become experts at their individual tasks and collectively speed up the building process. But this was only their day-job, they did not identify themselves by their mechanical task as a "lever-puller" or "joint-twister". Why then, do we attach ourselves and let ourselves be guided by such generalizations in our contemporary way of living?

If we toss off all general categories like "thinker", "artist", "businessman", "the life of the party", "the faithful girlfriend" (blech!), etc. and we allow ourselves instead to thrive off the richness of particulars, perhaps we can escape this tendency to close ourselves off from the world. By being fascinated with the localized particulars of life, attending to them as they reveal themselves to us, we are able to simultaneously respect our authentic self as well as the world. We respect ourselves by opening up to what we naturally inclines towards and we respect the world by being attuned to all the possibilities it offers to us. The world will give to us, every week (if not every day), new experiences, people, activities, and thoughts that have ample enough substance to dwell on, appreciate, and investigate. There is no need to form a preconception beforehand of what we are going to involve ourselves in or deliberately ignore. Let us become instead infinitely open to all the minutiae that life offers us every day. This doesn't mean that we don't have ideals that we will hold to even under difficult circumstances. It only acknowledges that everything deserves to be open for consideration, because none among us is ever so wise or elevated that we cannot learn something new from the natural world or the study of the character of another human.

The whole of natural science begins with a very simple sense of wonder at the natural world - in hearing the birds that sing in the morning, in feeling the rain patter upon our cheeks from grey and heavy clouds at dusk, and in watching as the seed in the ground becomes a flowering plant. The earth offers us a wealth of possibilities for thought and wonder that are easy to ignore, simply because our science textbooks have already told us how these things work! The whole theory of evolution is discoverable in the confines of a local park; who could say that it wouldn't be a thrilling enterprise to rediscover in your local habitat all the principles that serve to explain the origins of life across the whole earth and which have been working for billions of years?

Natural science is just one example of the enormity available to us in the simple experiences of a day, a week, a month. There are infinitely many wellsprings of inspiration to discover, though perhaps 'discover' isn't the right word to describe this occurance. To allow something in life to distinctly call to us is much different than searching out some determinable thing that we force to fit with an idea we have or others have about ourselves concerning who we ought to be (a student, a wife, a daughter, or more abstract things like 'a success' or ' a moneymaker'). We don't discover the source of our inspiration so much as the inspiration discovers us:

The everlasting universe of things
Flows through the mind, and rolls its rapid waves,
Now dark - now glittering - now reflecting gloom -
Now lending splendour, where from secret springs
The source of human thought its tribute brings
of waters - with a soul but half its own,
Such as a feeble brook will oft assume,
In the wild woods, among mountains lone,
Where waterfalls around it leap for ever,
Where woods and winds contend, and a vast river
Over its rock ceaselessly bursts and raves.

This wellspring brings us, we priveleged (in some sense) species of ape, its tribute of inspiring waters. Are we ready to give it notice and draw from it with our rustic buckets?

Amerikan Destiny; Or 'Advertisement on Ellis Island'

The glorious machine will take you into its bosom and find place for you there!

You will be paid so long as you work hourly, daily, weekly, yearly, and when you die, Amerika will provide a space for you in the ground, because Amerika is a wide land with much soil and unused space!

If you are in that space of time where you are not working but you are also not dead, Amerika will provide you with the liberating benefit of an electric wheelchair, which is, though much slower than a car, faster than the walking speed of 90% of Amerikans!

For an added price, you can also attach baskets to your wheelchair, almost as many as you would like, to buy groceries at the supermarket and snacks at the convenience store!

Everything is here for you in Amerika, you can fulfill any desire!

Wouldn't you like to be buried here in the Younited Staytes, knowing that you tilled the very soil that would become your own grave?

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Thoughts for the Day

A) I would rather eat a plate of steamed broccoli with sensual relish than take even one second to pray to god before a slab of BBQ ribs or pepperoni pizza.

C) No one really wants anyone or anything enough to break boundaries.

D) Experience has shown me that people of all minds, levels of knowledge, and intelligences are very able and willing to disregard things that others might consider profound as trivial, banal, or salacious. What this shows is not that there aren't very profound things in the world, but rather that the human imagination has a strong tendency towards sloth. [I know, just this week I said "nothing is profound"... well, do you think these thoughts are always directed at others?]

E) The world is [hers], who can see through its pretension. - Emerson

F) Pleasure throughout all the day does no good for a human. Doing work all day that one does not thoroughly enjoy is also no good. One must have some difficulty in one's life, but this is not the same thing as hardship, which can and should always be avoided.

G) What is hunger? Is it a desire, drive, or inspiration?

H) Following one's own conviction is certainly more than giving oneself over to authority; but changing an opinion accepted on authority into an opinion held out of personal conviction, does not necessarily alter the content of the opinion, or replace error with truth. The only difference between being caught up in a system of opinions and prejudices based on personal conviction, and being caught up in one based on the authority of others, lies in the added conceit that is innate in the former position. - Hegel